YOU ASKED FOR IT!
Each individual issue
of LipidManagement™ is now certified for CME credit–see
page 3 for details on how to apply for instant CME credit through
lipidhealth.org.
|
|
|


Antonio
M. Gotto, Jr, MD, DPhil
Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical
College of Cornell University |
|
Elizabeth
Barrett-Connor, MD
University of California, San Diego,
School of Medicine
Peter Ganz, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Scott
M. Grundy, MD, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center at Dallas
Steven
M. Haffner, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center
Donald B. Hunninghake, MD
University of Minnesota Medical School

Ronald M. Krauss, MD
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
University of California, Berkeley
John C. LaRosa, MD
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Peter Libby, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Harry L. Metcalf, MD
SUNY/Buffalo School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences
Copyright © 2003 Thomson Professional Postgraduate Services®
(PPS), 150 Meadowlands Parkway, Secaucus, NJ 07094-2304
USA. All rights reserved.
This
material may not be reproduced without the express written
permission of PPS. LipidManagement is an
educational initiative of the National Lipid Education
Council™. NLEC, National Lipid Education Council and
LipidManagement are trademarks used herein under
license.
Supported by an unrestricted educational
grant from Pfizer Inc

|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related
information on this website: |
In
the Slide Library section:
ALLHAT-LLT:
All-Cause Mortality
ALLHAT-LLT:
Comparison to Other Large, Long-Term Statin Trials
ASCOT-LLA:
Primary End Point
ASCOT-LLA:
Primary End Point in Subgroups
ATP
III: Risk Categories, LDL-C Goals
In
the Current Literature section:
Major Outcomes
in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients
Randomized to Pravastatin vs Usual Care: The Antihypertensive
and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial
(ALLHAT-LLT)
Furberg CD, Wright JT, Davis BR, et al, for the ALLHAT
Collaborative Research Group.
JAMA. 2002;288:2998-3007.
Prevention
of Coronary and Stroke Events With Atorvastatin in Hypertensive
Patients Who Have Lower-Than-Average Cholesterol Concentrations,
in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid
Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled
Trial
Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, et al, for the ASCOT Investigators.
Lancet. 2003;361:1149-1158.
Should Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure Be Considered for Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation: A Study in Middle-Aged Men and Women
Benetos A, Thomas F, Safar ME, Bean KE, Guize L.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:163-168.
|
|
Lipid-Lowering
Therapy in Patients With Hypertension
Hypertension
and hypercholesterolemia are independent risk factors for the development
of coronary heart disease (CHD).1
Although it is not yet known whether the frequent coexistence of
these two conditions in epidemiologic studies represents a statistical
association or pathophysiologic link,2
several recent clinical trials suggest that treatment of hypercholesterolemia
with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) not only improves lipid
profiles in patients with hypertension, but also enhances blood
pressure (BP) control.3
What, then, is the optimal therapeutic approach, based on current
research findings, for managing coexisting hypertension and hypercholesterolemia
in patients? Might lipid-lowering be an additional method of correcting
hypertension in this high-risk population? What effect, if any,
does lipid-lowering have on the incidence of CHD-related events
in these patients? Finally, do any antihypertensive medications
have long-term adverse effects on lipid profiles or interact adversely
with statins?
Association Between Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia
Up to 40% of hypertensive patients have hypercholesterolemia,4
and 40% of hypercholesterolemic patients have hypertension.5
In the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) of 316,099
white men aged 35 to
57 years, graded increases in cholesterol and systolic or diastolic
BP levels were related to corresponding increases in CHD death rates.
Moreover, the CHD death rate associated with these combined risk
factors exceeded that associated with each risk factor individually.6
Certain populations are particularly vulnerable to both conditions
(see “Populations at Risk…,” below).
It is likely that common pathogenetic features—such as insulin
resistance and endothelial dysfunction—contribute to the coexistence
of these conditions.1
| Populations at Risk for Combination of Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia |
Certain demographic groups are at
particular risk for developing both hypertension and hypercholesterolemia:
middle-aged men, elderly women, black women, and persons
with diabetes.
In men and women, the risk for hypertension
increases markedly with age.1
Of interest, systolic BP continues to rise with age in
women, whereas it peaks during middle age in men.2
Similarly, recent data indicate that older age affects
hypercholesterolemia risk in women, whereas men in their
30s or 40s are at greater risk than their older counterparts.3
In the non-Hispanic population, blacks aged 20 to 74 years
are more likely to have hypertension than whites; this
risk is higher in black women than in black men, and it is considerably higher in black women than
in white women.1-3 Non-Hispanic
black women are also more likely than black men to have
hypercholesterolemia.
Heart disease is a leading killer in
patients with diabetes because of the high prevalence
of coexisting hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.4
In fact, the Third Adult Treatment Panel of the National
Cholesterol Education Program (ATP III) has designated
diabetes a CHD risk equivalent.5
REFERENCES
| 1. |
National Center for Health Statistics,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health,
United States. 2002;table 68. Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.aspx. Accessed March
3, 2003. |
| 2. |
Wenger NK. The high risk of CHD
for women: understanding why prevention is crucial.
Medscape Women's Health J. 1996;1. Available
at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/
408830_print. Accessed March 3, 2003. |
| 3. |
National Center for Health Statistics,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health,
United States. 2002;table 69. Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.aspx. Accessed March
3, 2003. |
| 4. |
As diabetes epidemic surges, HHS
and ADA join forces to fight heart disease, the
leading cause of death for people with diabetes.
NIH News Release. Washington, DC: National
Institutes of Health. November 1, 2001. Available
at: http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/nov2001/niddk-01.aspx.
Accessed March 3, 2003. |
| 5. |
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.
Executive summary of the third report of the National
Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel
on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood
cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).
JAMA. 2001;285:2486-2497. |
|
|
|
One team of researchers had surmised that factors
affecting the endothelium (ie, lipoproteins) might play a role in
the development of hypertension. They found that, among 73 patients
with recently discovered and never-treated arterial hypertension,
those in the highest tertile of serum TC level experienced significant
increases in BP during isometric exercise.2
Investigators who examined 803 asymptomatic individuals aged 40
or older in the Rochester Family Heart Study found that hypertensive
men, as compared with their normotensive counterparts, had a significantly
lower level of HDL-C and a significantly higher prevalence and amount
of coronary artery calcification.7
Palmiero et al, who studied 200 postmenopausal women with previously
untreated hypertension, found that those who also had diastolic
dysfunction had significantly higher levels of TC and LDL-C and
significantly lower levels of HDL-C.5
The research of Sander and Giles has elucidated one of the biochemical
mechanisms that may connect hypertension and dyslipidemia: LDL-C
has been shown to upregulate the angiotensin (AT)-I receptor, resulting
in an increase in BP.8
Effects of Statins on BP Control
Three reviews suggest that statins—either alone or in combination
with certain antihypertensive agents—may lower BP in patients
with coexisting hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.1,3,4
All of these reviews cited a variety of studies demonstrating the
BP-lowering effect of statins in patients with untreated hypertension,
including some with type 2 diabetes. In some of these studies, reductions
in diastolic and systolic BP were found to be independent of plasma
TC reductions. Borghi also described studies in which retrospective
analyses found that statins enhanced the antihypertensive effect
of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel
blockers (CCB), but not that of ß-blockers or diuretics.3
The mechanism responsible for the statins’ BP-lowering effect
appears to be largely independent of their effect on plasma TC levels,
and may be due to their effects on endothelial function and AT-II
receptors.4 In addition, statins
may enhance the ability of ACE inhibitors and CCBs to reduce peripheral
vascular tone and improve peripheral vasodilator capacity.3
Effect of Statins on Arterial Stiffness
A recent double-blind crossover study showed that atorvastatin reduced
BP and large artery stiffness in 22 normolipidemic patients with
isolated systolic hypertension.9
Patients received a 3-month course of atorvastatin 80 mg daily or
placebo. Along with its favorable effect on lipid profiles (even
in a normolipidemic population), atorvastatin, when compared with
placebo, increased systemic arterial compliance, as measured by
carotid applanation tonometry and Doppler velocimetry of the ascending
aorta. It also significantly reduced brachial systolic BP by an
average of 6 mm Hg (P=0.03) and diastolic BP by an average
of 2 mm Hg (P=0.04).
Effects of Statins on Mortality/CHD in Hypertensive Patients
Substudies of two large trials have assessed the effects of statins
in patients with hypertension. (See “Two Major Clinical
Trials…,” below, for a description of the main elements
of the trials.)
Two
Major Clinical Trials Exploring the
Lipid/Blood Pressure Connection |
ASCOT-LLA1:
 |
Substudy: lipid-lowering arm of the ongoing
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial |
 |
Participants: 10,305 aged 40–79
years with BP >160 mm Hg systolic and/or
>100 mm Hg diastolic (untreated) or >140
mm Hg systolic and/or >90 mm Hg diastolic
(treated); TC <250 mg/dL and TG <400
mg/dL; >3 risk factors for CVD |
 |
Randomization: atorvastatin 10 mg (5,168)
or placebo (5,137) |
 |
Primary end-point outcomes: 36% reduction
in atorvastatin group vs placebo in nonfatal MI
(including silent MI) and fatal CHD (significant;
P=0.0005) |
 |
Significant secondary end-point outcomes:
(in atorvastatin group vs placebo for all) 27% reduction,
fatal and nonfatal stroke (P=0.0236); 21%
reduction, total CV events including revascularization
(P=0.0005); 29% reduction, total coronary
events (P=0.0005); 38% reduction, primary
end point excluding silent MI (P=0.0005) |
 |
Lipid reductions: (in atorvastatin vs
placebo) 19% TC; 29% LDL-C; 14% TG |
 |
Length: LLA terminated after 3.3 years
(5-year planned length) due to early positive results |
ALLHAT-LLT2:
 |
Substudy: lipid-lowering trial component
of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment
to Prevent Heart Attack Trial |
 |
Participants: 10,355 ALLHAT participants
(age =55 years, stage 1 or 2 hypertension with at
least 1 additional CHD risk factor); LDL-C: 120–189
mg/dL (100–129 mg/dL if known CHD) and TG
<350 mg/dL |
 |
Randomization: open-label pravastatin
40 mg (5,170) or usual care (5,185); Note: during
trial, 32% of usual-care participants with, and
29% without, CHD started on a lipid-lowering drug |
 |
Primary end-point outcomes: 6-year all-cause
mortality rates: 14.9% for pravastatin vs 15.3%
for usual care (P=0.88) |
 |
Secondary end-point outcomes: 6-year
CHD event (nonfatal MI or fatal CHD combined) rates:
9.3% for pravastatin vs 10.4% for usual case (not
significantly different; P=0.16) |
 |
Lipid reductions: (in pravastatin vs
usual care at 4 years) 9.6% TC; 16.7% LDL-C |
 |
Length: LLT follow-up was 6 years |
REFERENCES
| 1. |
Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR,
et al, for the ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of
coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in
hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average
cholesterol concentrations, in the ASCOT —Lipid
Lowering Arm: a multicenter randomized controlled
trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1149-1158. |
| 2. |
The ALLHAT Collaborative Research
Group. Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic,
hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin
vs usual care. JAMA. 2002;288:2998-3007. |
|
|
|
ASCOT-LLA. Results of the
Lipid-Lowering Arm (LLA)10 of the
ongoing Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)11
were dramatic enough to warrant the substudy’s premature termination.
The study was designed to assess benefits of cholesterol lowering
in the primary prevention of CHD in hypertensives not considered
dyslipidemic. A total of 10,305 ASCOT participants (TC <250
mg/dL) were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg daily or placebo.
These subjects did not have preexisting CHD, although they had >3
CVD risk factors. After 3 years, atorvastatin recipients, relative
to placebo recipients, had a significantly lower incidence of MI
and stroke.
ALLHAT-LLT. Results of
the Lipid-Lowering Trial (LLT)12
of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent
Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)13 were
modest. The goal of the LLT was to assess the impact of reductions
in TC and LDL-C on all-cause mortality in a hypertensive cohort
with at least one additional CHD risk factor and to assess CHD reduction
(fatal CHD or nonfatal MI) in populations excluded from or underrepresented
in previous trials.12 A total of
10,355 patients who were enrolled in ALLHAT and who had moderate
hypercholesterolemia were randomized to receive open-label pravastatin
40 mg daily or usual care provided by their primary care physician.
After 6 years of follow-up, the mean differences in TC and LDL-C
levels (pravastatin vs usual care) were 18.9 mg/dL and 17.2 mg/dL,
respectively. All-cause mortality, the primary outcome measure,
did not differ significantly between groups, and rates of CHD and
stroke were only slightly and nonsignificantly lower in pravastatin
recipients.
One of the main reasons that the pravastatin
group did not have a significant reduction in risk compared with
the usual-care group is that almost one third of the latter received
a statin. At the same time, a sizable proportion of pravastatin
recipients did not adhere to their regimen. As a result, the differential
in cholesterol lowering between the two groups was insufficient
to produce the degree of risk reduction seen in the major placebo-controlled
statin trials, in which the placebo subjects experienced little
or no cholesterol lowering.
Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs on Lipid Profiles
Do any antihypertensive drug classes have adverse effects on lipid
profiles or interact adversely with statins, possibly canceling
the potential benefits of the lipid-lowering agents?
Thiazide diuretics and loop diuretics may
raise levels of TC, TG, and LDL-C,14
although these values appear to revert to pretreatment levels with
long-term thiazide therapy. One study showed that only hydrochlorothiazide
nonresponders—not responders—experienced adverse changes
in lipid profiles.15 Similarly,
ß-blockers may increase levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, and VLDL-C,
and they may slightly decrease levels of HDL-C,14
but one study of atenolol found that these changes were not significant
after 1 year of therapy.15 Other
studies suggest that pindolol does not significantly alter lipid
profiles, that acebutolol lowers TC and LDL-C, and that carvedilol
and bisoprolol have no significant effect on TC and TG.14
Alpha 1-blockers have favorable effects on lipids and may reverse
the deleterious lipid effects of diuretics and ß-blockers.16
CCBs, ACE inhibitors, and AT-II receptor blockers are not known
to have adverse effects on lipid profiles or to interact with statins.
In fact, ACE inhibitors may improve lipid metabolism in patients
with hypertension.17
Conclusion
The chance of developing CHD frequently depends on the presence
of two or more risk factors, each of which may be mild in degree.2
In many patients with both hypertension and hypercholesterolemia,
a multidrug regimen is needed to address these individual risk factors.
However, it may be possible to derive dual benefits from statins:
Although further study is needed to confirm early findings, it appears
that statins, through their lipid-lowering effect and/or another
mecha-nism, may help lower BP as well. At the very least, large
trials have shown that these medications are effective in improving
lipid profiles in this high-risk population. They may also improve
BP control in patients taking antihypertensive medication.
References*
| 1. |
Wierzbicki AS. J Hum Hypertens.
2002;16:753-760. |
| 2. |
Ferrara LA et al. J Hum Hypertens.
2002;16:337-343. |
| 3. |
Borghi C. Curr Opin Nephrol
Hypertens. 2002;11:489-496. |
| 4. |
Borghi C et al. J Clin Hypertens.
2002;4:277-285. |
| 5. |
Palmiero P et al. Am J Hypertens.
2002;15:615-620. |
| 6. |
Neaton JD et al. Arch Intern
Med. 1992;152:56-64. |
| 7. |
Jamjoum LS et al. Med Sci
Monit. 2002;8:CR775-CR781. |
| 8. |
Sander GE et al. Curr Hypertens
Rep. 2002;4:458-463. |
| 9. |
Ferrier KE et al. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2002;39:1020-1025. |
| 10. |
Nadar S et al. J Hum Hypertens.
2002;16:815-817. |
| 11. |
Sever PS et al. Lancet.
2003;361:1149-1158. |
| 12. |
ALLHAT Collaborative Research
Group. JAMA. 2002;288:2998-3007. |
| 13. |
ALLHAT Collaborative Research
Group. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997. |
| 14. |
Drug Facts and Comparisons.
St Louis, Mo: Wolters Kluwer. 2002. |
| 15. |
Lakshman MR et al. Arch Intern
Med. 1999;159:551-558. |
| 16. |
Sever PS. Curr Med Res Opin.
1999;15:95-103. |
| 17. |
Shionoiri H et al. Clin Ther. 1995;17:1126-1135. |
*For
complete citations, please click here.
This article was reviewed for medical accuracy by
Antonio M. Gotto, Jr, MD, DPhil, chairman of the National Lipid Education
Council™. Dr Gotto has indicated a financial interest or affiliation
as noted: consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer Corporation, Bristol-Myers
Squibb Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc, and Reliant Pharmaceuticals.
|